In its decision dated 12 November 2012, the Supreme Court confirmed the ruling of first instance which quashed the agreement of the Central Administrative Economic Tribunal that, by breaching the duty to abstain envisaged in Article 66 of the Agreement, had entered into the substance of the matter in question, relating to the consideration of the operations performed in Navarra for the purposes of determining the volume of operations attributable to the “common territory”, failing to recognise the jurisdiction of the Board of Arbitration of the Economic Agreement. The latter will need to be the one that rules on the disputed matter.